2. Context
3. Projection
SPRING 2023
LONDON
This project examines the concept of hostile architecture, focusing specifically on the use of architectural spikes in public spaces. Through a combination of research, critical analysis, and creative practice, I’ve explored how design can manipulate behaviour and influence the dynamics of urban life. The final outcome is a publication that encapsulates these findings, blending contextual insights with visual responses to provoke thought and discussion.
Context
The starting point for this project was a close investigation of architectural spikes, as seen in the Victoria and Albert Museum’s collection. These objects, deliberately designed to exclude, represent a physical manifestation of hostile design practices. Through examining their materials, forms, and placements, I’ve explored the broader cultural and societal impact of such interventions. This research has informed a deeper consideration of the ethics and responsibilities tied to designing spaces that shape human interactions and dictate who “belongs” in a public setting.
Projection
The outcome of this project is a publication that bridges my interest in material culture and communication design, transforming abstract research into an object that invites engagement on multiple levels. Beyond visual exploration, this piece encourages tactile interaction, allowing the audience to connect with the subject through its material presence. The graphics themselves explore the concept of materiality, using visual representation in deliberate and concrete ways to reflect the physicality of the subject matter. By engaging both the senses and the intellect, the publication becomes a tool for provoking thought and fostering a deeper dialogue about the intersection of design, ethics, and public spaces.
Bibliography
Museum, V.and A. (2014) Architectural spikes: V&A explore the collections, Victoria and Albert Museum: Explore the Collections. Available at: https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O1296001/architectural-spikes-kent-stainless-ltd/ (Accessed:
February 18, 2023).
Petty , J. (2016) “The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of ‘Hostile Architecture,’” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/5(1): 67‐81 .
de Fine Licht, K. (2021) “Hostile architecture” and its Confederates: A Conceptual Framework for how we should perceive our cities and the objects in them, View of “Hostile architecture” and its Confederates:
A Conceptual Framework for how we should perceive our cities and the objects in them. The University of Winnipeg. Available at: https://cjur.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/cjur/article/view/290/145 (Accessed: February 18, 2023).
Laranjo, F. (2014) Critical graphic design: Critical of what?, Modes of Criticism. Available at: https://modesofcriticism.org/critical-graphic-design/ (Accessed: February 23, 2023).
Park Bench House (2002) Sean Godsell architects. Available at: https://www.seangodsell.com/park-bench-house (Accessed: February 23, 2023).
Newman, O. and Franck, K.A. (1980) “Creating Defensible Space,” in Factors influencing crime and instability in urban housing developments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Anderson, B. (2006) “Census, Map, Museum,” in Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London ; New York: Verso, pp. 163–185.
Zeitoun , L. (2022) Artist Sarah Ross defies hostile and inaccessible architecture with satirical jogging outfits, designboom. designboom. Available at: https://www.designboom.com/art/sarah-ross-archisuits-project-los-angeles-11-03-2022/ (Accessed:
February 20, 2023).